Individual and Organizational Learning
Summary
This article covers Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory
(LSI) in quite a bit of detail. However, there wasn’t much here that
wasn’t already covered in class. The
exercises described are essentially the same as we completed in curriculum,
with only minor and insignificant differences. There is some overview
information about how this information might be used in corporations and other
larger organizations. This article map focuses
primarily on new information not covered in class.
Why Dumb Things Happen to Smart Companies
§
Constant change in the current business culture means
that companies can gain an advantage over competitors by learning how to learn
faster.
Symptoms that a company is not “working smart:”
§
You
repeat mistakes. “The best way to avoid repeated errors is study
failure as assiduously as success.”
§
You
duplicate work. “People fail to copy success for the same reasons
that they succeed in copying mistakes: They’re afraid or too embarrassed to
ask. Sometimes the problem is in systems and structures: They don’t know where
to look or looking takes to much time or they have no place to store corporate
memory. Sometimes the problem is what one might call an overdeveloped
engineer’s mind: ‘I know Ed already did this, but I can do it better.”
§
You
have poor customer relations.
§
Good
ideas don’t transfer between departments, units, or countries.
This is the most common knowledge problem of all. Companies can get past
rewarding individual accomplishment by building in incentives for sharing the
knowledge base (e.g., nudge people in meetings to talk about what they know,
create incentives based on knowledge sharing competence, reward both low
performers and high performers for closing knowledge gaps and improving performance).
§
You’re
competing on price…rather than relationship building.
§
You
can’t compete with market leaders.
§
You’re
dependent on key individuals. “Nothing is more dangerous than
depending on a few key people…The fault may no lie in your stars. Sometimes people
have greatness thrust upon them because others are unwilling to achieve it
themselves.”
§
You’re
slow to launch new products or enter new markets.
§
You
don’t know how to price for service.
Learning Style Inventory
§
Four learning styles: divergent, assimilation, convergent, and accommodative.
§
Divergent
style emphasizes concrete experience and reflective observation. Strengths of
this style: imaginative ability and awareness of meaning and values, ability to
view situations from many perspectives and to organize many relationships into
a meaningful gestalt.
§
Assimilating style emphasizes abstract conceptualization and
reflective observation. Strengths are in inductive reasoning, creating
theoretical models and assimilating disparate observations into an integrated
explanation. Focus is on logically sound and precise ideas and theories.
§
Convergent style emphasizes abstract conceptualization and
active experimentation. Strengths are in problem solving, decision making and
the practical application of ideas. Convergent learners tend to control their
emotional expression, and prefer dealing with technical tasks and problems,
rather than personal and social issues.
§
Accommodating style emphasizes concrete experience and active
experimentation. Strengths are in doing things, carrying out plans and tasks,
and getting involved in new experiences; opportunity seeking, risk, taking and
action; good at adjusting to frequent change. Accommodating learners tend to
discard the plan or theory if their experience doesn’t match up.
Managing the Learning Process
§
“Some organizations employ parallel learning
structures. These are defined as apart of the organization that operates
alongside the normal bureaucracy with the purpose of increasing organizational
learning by creating and/or implementing new thoughts and behaviors. Parallel
learning structures consist of a ‘steering committee and a number of small
groups with norms and operating procedures that promote a climate conducive to
innovation, learning, and group problem solving’ that is not possible in a
larger bureaucracy.” (p. 52)
§
FINAL
KEY POINT: “The nature of the learning process is such that
opposing perspectives—action
and reflection, concrete involvement, and analytical detachment—are all
essential for optimal learning.” (p. 53)